<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics Exam Paper, 2018</title>
	<atom:link href="http://test.org.uk/2003/09/21/politics-exam-paper-2018/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://test.org.uk/2003/09/21/politics-exam-paper-2018/</link>
	<description>Looking for a cure for inertia since 1972</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overmorgen</title>
		<link>http://test.org.uk/2003/09/21/politics-exam-paper-2018/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overmorgen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlocke.wordpress.com/2003/09/21/politics-exam-paper-2018/#comment-94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Another Matt&#039;s scenarios&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#039;s Matt Locke&#039;s turn to create some mini-scenarios.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another Matt&#8217;s scenarios</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s Matt Locke&#8217;s turn to create some mini-scenarios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisL</title>
		<link>http://test.org.uk/2003/09/21/politics-exam-paper-2018/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChrisL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattlocke.wordpress.com/2003/09/21/politics-exam-paper-2018/#comment-93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one doesn&#039;t really work as well as the medistudies one.  Q2 in section 2 says nothing, other than offering some quasi-Nostrodamus prophecies about when and where future assasinations might have been.  your dates and time scould equally have been Dallas &#039;63, Sarajevo &#039;14, etc.

The format is too elliptical, and doesn&#039;t allow the reader to really engage with what you&#039;re saying.  It&#039;s like you&#039;re holding back from forming scenarios because of your doubts about the validity of the scenario format itself.

Jonesy&#039;s stories were flawed as genuine future scenarios in &#039;proper&#039; sense, but they were wonderfully evocative, which these exam papers aren&#039;t.


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one doesn&#8217;t really work as well as the medistudies one.  Q2 in section 2 says nothing, other than offering some quasi-Nostrodamus prophecies about when and where future assasinations might have been.  your dates and time scould equally have been Dallas &#8217;63, Sarajevo &#8217;14, etc.</p>
<p>The format is too elliptical, and doesn&#8217;t allow the reader to really engage with what you&#8217;re saying.  It&#8217;s like you&#8217;re holding back from forming scenarios because of your doubts about the validity of the scenario format itself.</p>
<p>Jonesy&#8217;s stories were flawed as genuine future scenarios in &#8216;proper&#8217; sense, but they were wonderfully evocative, which these exam papers aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

